Isn't a too big drawback?
At 13.46 16/07/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Why? If you want a Titan with a particular weapon combo purchase it
>as a single special card... IMO, the "fixed" weapon combo is a nice
>drawback to a Titan Battlegroup card...
>
>--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "NetEpic Webmaster" <webmaster_at_n...>
>wrote:
> > Then all of us with unique titans can't use them. Make then a unit
>with a
> > coherency of 15, make one titan a command unit (acts as a spotter
>for all
> > the other titans, if the commanding unit is destroyed then the
>battlegroup
> > misses a turn whilst they calibrate there computers for independant
> > fighting. Kinda like the leviathon).
> >
> > Tom Webb
> > Webmaster of the EPICentre http://www.netepic.org - Home of
>Netepic, EPIC:
> > Armageddon, VOID and Heresy
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_t...>
> > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:02 PM
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Titan Battlegroup
> >
> >
> > > Maybe we can state that Titans in a battlegroup must maintain
> > > coherency between them (up to 15cm?) and must have the same weapon
> > > configuration. We can even divise some standard configurations
>(Close
> > > Combat, Anti-Infantry, Anti-Tank...)
> > >
> > > --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_t...>
>wrote:
> > > > What I've intended was: no drawbacks purchasing a battlegroup
> > > instead
> > > > of three separate Titans. When I purchase a battlegroup, I have
>two
> > > > more special card slots available... it's a no-brainer.
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Jul 16 2003 - 21:59:43 UTC