Hi!
As we've done before is such cases, I'll use and "optional, alternate"
rule. People can playtest it and then at a later date pass judgment on
it.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:03 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2
Leave it as it is... too powerful otherwise =)
--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "ramospeter" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > ---> This is a pretty nifty weapon. As long as there no save from
> the effect
> > of the warphole it needs to have a penalty related to it. I recon
> that even
> > for Eldar it shoulkd be difficult to open a "warpgate" in a exact
> location
> > on a planet. Therefor the tripple scatterroll is a good penalty
> for a weapon
> > of this caliber!
>
> Nils does have a point, its hard to hit but you get destroyed if
you
> do. Any more opinions on this?
>
> Primarch
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Jul 23 2003 - 20:57:40 UTC