Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Zerloon <zerloon_at_...>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:40:30 +0200

>
>
>Not all weapons are useful in all situations, and expecially
>potentially broken weapons like this are adequately limited by the
>rules. I would not make such change without an adequate testing.

Agree, would you dare to test with only one scatter roll?
Received on Thu Jul 24 2003 - 21:40:30 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: costanzo: "Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"
Previous message: AntiChrist: "Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"
In reply to: AntiChrist: "Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"
Next in thread: AntiChrist: "Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"
Reply: AntiChrist: "Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"
Reply: Peter Ramos: "RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:55 UTC