RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:41:40 -0400

Hi!

I think it needs to be tested... a lot, before implementing. As I said
before, let's keep the rule as is and suggest this alternate. When
people have sufficient experience with it then we can re-examine it.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Zerloon [mailto:zerloon_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:41 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Eldar revision part 2


>
>
>Not all weapons are useful in all situations, and expecially
>potentially broken weapons like this are adequately limited by the
>rules. I would not make such change without an adequate testing.

Agree, would you dare to test with only one scatter roll?




To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Jul 24 2003 - 22:41:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:55 UTC