Hi!
Actually that is not a bad thought to increase the dice for deviation
and reduce the overall amount of dice. It reflects the weapons
inaccuracy.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Montabert [mailto:kotrin_at_...]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:59 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [5.0] Eldar revision part 2
To me, the problem is not that the weapon is more or
less powerful but simply that resolving a shot takes
forever. Two 2d6 scatters... You could nearly close
your eyes and throw a template from your table' side
to get the same effect !
Perhaps we could keep the unpredictability but with
less dice rolls ? For example:
Have it scatter once but of 3d6 cm. If a HIT is
rolled, reroll it once, only a second HIT will leave
the template in place.
That leaves the same predictability for a real hit
(two 5+ rolls) and allow on average the template to go
quite far (up to 45 cm deviation, average 25 cm!)
>
>
>Not all weapons are useful in all situations, and
expecially
>potentially broken weapons like this are adequately
limited by the
>rules. I would not make such change without an
adequate testing.
Agree, would you dare to test with only one scatter
roll?
=====
Stephane "The Guy Without A Nickname" Montabert
"It's better to enlarge the game than to restrict the players." -- Eric
Wujcik
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Jul 25 2003 - 13:36:40 UTC