Re: Cost questions

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:57:50 -0000

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "yar_underwood" <jarreas_at_m...> wrote:
> I apologize for the previous poll - I was about to put up a series
of
> polls about unit costs, and realized I really should post something
> first to see if it's worthwhile. I've found a number of the Eldar
> units are over or under-priced. I was wondering if other folks have
> found the same.
>
> Cobra: List cost 250, but the main gun always scatters and the
> secondaries aren't that impressive. I suggest dropping the cost to
> 200, or increasing the secondary weapons (now 2 dice at range 25)
to
> three dice and 50 cm. The To-Hit would remain at 5+, 0 TSM.

+AC+ I'm for lowering the cost to 200

> Wave Serpent: Perhaps the most massively useful APC in the game,
> IMHO. I propose raising the cost to 200 points.

+AC+ Agree

> Vibro-Cannon: Currently the TSM is 0 if one hits you, -2 if two
and -
> 2 for three. I'd like to improve the seige capabilities by saying
> it's always -3 for buildings. Peter's suggestion (I think it was
his)
> of making the titan Tremor Cannon be -6 TSM against buildings would
> also follow along with this.

+AC+ Agree

> Other Eldar questions:
> In 40k, is there a difference between a Scout, a Ranger and a
> Pathfinder? I'd like to name the basic scout one thing, and the
> Alaitoc scouts something else. Currently they're Pathfinders and
> Alaitoc Rangers. Is this generally acceptable?

+AC+ Rangers for the basic scouts, Pathfinders for the Alaitoc scouts

> Why did the Deathstalker name get changed to Fire Prism? Was that a
> GW thing?

+AC+ Yes
Received on Wed Oct 08 2003 - 09:57:50 UTC