Re: [NetEpic ML] bases

From: thedlx1984 <the_dlx_at_...>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:34:25 -0000

Hi,

I also prefer the feeling and handling of the old square bases and
therefore use those. Although I have to admit that hordes of Imperial
Guard Infantry mounted in lines on the new bases look damn good...

Oli

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, darius spano <dmanspano_at_y...> wrote:
> Bob,
> I for one prefer the old square bases. The new ones
> are great for painting. I have played against others
> who use the new bases and there is little problems.
> They don't fit in the old buildings as easily. The
> templates have more of an area to touch. I ,ake my own
> and use GZG 4-man infantry elements for my command,
> terminators and tyranids. Saves minis and gives them a
> nice weighty feel. The old bases rule!!!!
> Darius
> --- rdmcii2001 <rdmcii_at_a...> wrote:
> > Given a sample size of 2 (thanks guys!) I don't
> > think I know what
> > the prefered basing type for NetEpic is. Like the
> > responders, most of
> > my old Armies are 20x20mm. Looking to the future,
> > the next release of
> > epic appears to be 10x40 so that may be the way to
> > go. I've been
> > toying with doing at least some units as 20x40mm
> > representing 2
> > units. This is the "common denominator" between the
> > 2 basing, and is
> > good if you have the odd warmaster unit (say skinks
> > as sauruses)
> > doing double duty in epic. of course this would not
> > work for all
> > units.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
Received on Tue Oct 07 2003 - 09:34:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:56 UTC