Don't forget the NetEPIC timeline - it provides quite a bit of explaination
as to the Slanns origins and the creation of the races.
http://www.netepic.org/EZINE/html/articles.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.
> Fluffwise, I have read that it is the Slann who made both eldar, humans,
orks and even the Tau. They also made the tyranids, but at some point the
expiriment went terribly wrong. Off course the Slann has not verified
this...
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
> > Dato: 2003/10/29 Wed PM 10:54:43 CET
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.
> >
> > Jarreas Underwood wrote:
> >
> > >I'm a little unclear about how the NetEpic Slaan/Necrons relate to the
GW Necrons - is the background the same, did you come up with the Necrons
before GW? 40k Necrons are some mongo bad guys all on their own, while here
they're relegated to a support/slave race role. Which part do we want them
to play? It's not really sufficient to say they're a stand-alone army, as
that makes the assumption that they're subservient to the Slaan.
> > >
> > >Personally, my opinion is to leave 'em lower in the heirarchy - it
makes sense that *someone* created a machine race. V'ger aside, machine
races don't evolve.
> > >-Yar
> > >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > They "don't" relate Jar. The fluff is a total net epic created spin off,
> > where the slann create the necron to turn the tide in the war against
> > the tyranids.
> >
> > So they are of a different nature than GW necrons.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 08:37:23 UTC