Even as much as I dislike the "stayability" of the mechs, I think they should keep their two saves. It is very much in character with the other warpintensive stuff. With a 5+ warpshield they can compare to a landraider backed up by a techmarine.
Eivind
>
> Fra: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
> Dato: 2003/10/30 Thu PM 12:08:10 CET
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)
>
> I think I need to re-read the Slaan book. I heard mention of an armor save plus a shield save, and I think that's the only double save in the game other than the Gorgon. I suggest something on the order of a 3+ fixed save (2+ for the Bullfrogs), much like the Imperial Knights - they've got a 3+ fixed to the front, and it makes sense that Slaan can extend this to all-around. A double save increases both unit durability and game resolution time - I'd prefer to keep the double save as a *very* special ability, not standard equipment.
>
> However, I'm heading to a conference in half an hour and won't be back 'till Sunday. I'll try and re-read the Slaan over next week and see how my suggestion would fit into the army.
> -Yar
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> \~
> |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
> |~ ^
> /~ |
> You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 11:53:35 UTC