Re: two (late) notes on orks

From: ramospeter <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:31:58 -0000

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Albert Farr� Benet <cibernyam_at_h...> wrote:
> ZZZZZZZ...(teleportation activating)
>
> I had some free time today and I have been doing some revision on
(the lot of) messages from the last two months. I just have two
questions/opinions on orks, if still open to discussion.
>
> The Landa has a nice (orky, I would say) landing roll with scatter
and artillery dice. Though the idea it's OK in my opinion, I must say
that I think that a result of misfire in the artillery dice should
also imply scatter unless a hit is rolled in the scatter dice. I think
the rules in v5A state that a crash implies a direct hit on target.
>
> The second point is the "extra support" cards. Personally I like the
old idea of adding second (and third) clan cards. We experimented with
that some time ago, and it worked quite fine (fear a BIG kult of speed
running amok all over the table without orders. THAT was chaos).
Instead of adding 1-5 boyz support cards (more flexible, I admit) you
add some boyz and a proportional quantity of Nobz.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> ZZZZZZZZ....(back to hard work for still another month)
>
> Albert


Hi!

Good ideas Albert!

If there is no opposition we can add these as optional.

Jar, add this to your notes please.

Thanks!

Peter
Received on Thu Nov 06 2003 - 23:31:58 UTC