well we could always have the slanns take them over and possibly add their
own modifications to them. That could explain any differences.. such as trhe
disruptor fields (which 40K necrons no longer have)
Weasel
Pure in heart
Strong in mind
What need we fear ?
>From: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] necron names
>Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:59:55 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
>
> >well, the 40K necrons dont really have any allies. They are mindless
>drones
>of the Ctan.
>
>Artificial intelligences, right? Long periods of time stashed in bunkers
>scattered all over the universe, yes? I'll have to go back and look over
>the necron/C'tan relationship and timeline, but it seems to me that if
>there were multiple Necron 'weapon depots', it makes sense that at least
>one of 'em "woke up" and became independent. They'd still be Necrons, but
>not under the control of the C'tan - they'd be the neo-Necrons (maybe the
>Neocrons) - and would fairly definitely be fighting against the C'tan. Not
>necessarily fighting the still-enslaved Necrons, but probably at
>cross-purposes most of the time.
>
>How's that work?
>-Yar
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>\~
> |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
> |~ ^
>/~ |
> You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/netepic/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> netepic-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger
http://messenger.msn.dk
Received on Mon Jan 12 2004 - 19:01:10 UTC