RE: [NetEpic ML] Necron infantry question #2

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:56:43 +0100

Hepp,

This unit was created by the NorthernConnection during playtesting. They are
considered walkers, however at the time we did not allow walkert to enter
areas such as rubble or woods. We wanted this unit to operate more like a
infantryunit (Since Necron Immortals infact are infantry...), we knew we
would have trouble locally to add another pure infantry unit, so we added
the restriction with regards to the buildings. This got them accepted.

Nils

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: 17. mars 2004 00:51
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Necron infantry question #2


Sorry - it's the Necron Immortal that has that comment. The question still
stands, though.

Speaking of the Immortal, it's "treated as infantry for all movement
restrictions, except they may not enter buildings." It's also described as
huge and heavily armored. Shouldn't the ability be given to the Destroyer,
which is described as "Its legs are incredibly agile and move with
unsurpassed speed." Should we swap the ability or change the descriptions?
Has there already been discussion that I need to go read in the archives?
-Yar


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
 |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
 |~ ^
/~ |
         You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links



 
Received on Wed Mar 17 2004 - 07:56:43 UTC