Re: [NetEpic ML] New Special Ability

From: ramospeter <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:26:26 -0000

Hi!

Agreed. Put it in the optionals book for now.

Peter

P.S. Jar, I have been having problems with my e-mail, have you
receive some e-mails I sent you directly? Let me know.


--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_m...>
wrote:
> >Special Ability: Static Artillery
>
> I've looked at the various heavy artillery units available, and I
think the potential for abuse is a little too high. This is starting
to look like E:A with the various units having multiple options. Not
a bad thing, but is this a direction we want NetEpic to go? Yes,
it's more versitile and allows a player to customise his army, but
it's moving away form the KISS rule. I make a motion that we put the
Static ability into the Optional Rules book. That way folks can see
and playtest it, but it's not in the core rules to confuse things.
> -Yar
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=
> \~
> |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
> |~ ^
> /~ |
> You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out
there? -->
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=
Received on Tue Jun 29 2004 - 16:26:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 11:00:00 UTC