Re: [NetEpic ML] Chaos Army B ook  (Long)
 
Hi!
Mete SENYOL wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I did not have time before to review chaos rules, even though I did 
>volunteered to be one of the chaos reviewers.
>
>But I am back now and have some comments:
>
>For the hatred acording to GW fluff Khorne hates Slaanesh, and 
>Tzeentch hates Nurgle. But in chaos army book of netepic it is 
>Khorne vs Tzeentch, Slaanesh vs Nurgle. I did not know the 
>discussion but Rubric of Ahriman is cast to prevent the changes, 
>which Nurgle favours. Slaanesh likes torture where Khorne wants good 
>fight. I think GW way is more logical.
>  
>
This is most likely an oversight on my part. You are correct according 
to the fluff and it should be changed to reflect that.
>For the Pinning in Greater Daemons section we can add Lord of 
>Battles too to the exception with Plague Tower as it is considered 
>as a Greater Daemon.
>  
>
Lord of battle is a titan sized unit, and rules for titans apply. Pehaps 
that is why t wasnt mentioned.
>For Terror, Since a Greater Daemon is considered as a Knight Class, 
>in my opinion superheavies should not be immun to "No First Fire" 
>rule as they can be pinned by Greator Daemons.
>  
>
Perhaps the terror rules should be re-written to state that only units 
that can be pinned or less be vulnerable to the no first fire rule.
Comments?
>A question for the animosity rule. Does it cover only the Greater 
>Daemons that hate each other or is it covers all the Greater Daemons?
>  
>
In a sense both. Since, if the greater demon is affected, all units 
attached to it are affected.
>In the Daemon Engines section it is writen that Khorne Daemon 
>engines cannot be given Advance or First Fire orders. In the 
>previous editions this was "as can only be given advance or charge 
>orders". If we cannot give them advance order how can we fire their 
>ranged attacks? And for the cannons of Khorne they can be only fired 
>in first fire orders we can enter this as an exception to the 
>summary.
>  
>
Thats a typo. It should read "only given advance or charge orders, not 
first fire". This applies to most demon engines except artillery 
engines. It should be reworded to clarify this.
>In the Slaanesh list Fiends of Slaanesh entry it is writen as "Any 
>unit in close combat with Daemonettes must make an armour..." I 
>think daemonettes should be Fiends of Slaanesh.
>  
>
Copy/paste error. Should be fixed
>In the Tzeentch List Disc Raiders entry it is writen that they may 
>transport one infantry stand. Although as a chaos player I will like 
>to have 5 units for 200 points with transport ability. I don't think 
>they are capable of transporting any unit. I think this is a typo.
>  
>
Correct. Typo.
>I will read the Chaos marines section later.
>
>This is my comments for now.
>
>Hope you will make comments on these and the list will be more 
>active in the future.
>  
>
Thanks for the commentary. I will forward this to Jar for editing.
Peter
Received on Mon Feb 21 2005 - 20:26:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 11:00:01 UTC