Re: [NetEpic ML] The Rules, and Variants.

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:53:11 -0400

Jyrki Saari wrote:

>--- superpeon_2000 <pdeadman_at_...> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have a question that might be a little tricky to
>>answer, or maybe
>>not. Your rules are magnificent...am I allowed to
>>add a few
>>modifications of my own, such as different races and
>>the like?
>>
>>
>
>Absolutely. That's what the NetEpic is all about. And
>that's why there is a long list of optional things.
>:o)
>
>
>
>>Not to
>>post here, or the like, and I would certainly credit
>>this marvellous
>>crew for their efforts.
>>
>>
>
>Please do post them here. That is how many of the now
>"official" races started. Slann and Sisters of Battle
>being good examples. And our ezine (Incoming!) is
>always hungry for submissions.
>
>
>
>>Any info on this would be great. Also, what is your
>>official, legal
>>position with GW? Do they have any complaints about
>>what you are doing?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well, there has for a ling time been a link from the
>specialist games site to Epicentre so I'd assume they
>have no problem with us doing what we do; as long as
>we don't use their artwork or anything like that.
>After all, Net Epic _is_ an incentive for people to
>buy new GW minis while GW doesn't pay a penny for the
>development/support.
>
>
>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Pete
>>
>>
>
>J Saari
>
>
Hi!

I agree with Jyrki's comments. One of the main reasons we avoid issues
with GW's IP, is that we never use their images and we make the rules
totally in our own words. No copy/paste. That helps a lot.

Peter
Received on Wed Sep 14 2005 - 23:53:11 UTC