Re: [NetEpic ML] Digest Number 1789

From: <rdmcii_at_...>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:48:57 -0500

I could live with slann-necron
 
Bob
 
-----Original Message-----
From: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: 30 Jan 2006 12:20:47 -0000
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Digest Number 1789


There is 1 message in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

      1. Re: Slann necron
           From: Lorenzo Canapicchi <canapicchi_at_...>


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
   Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:26:34 +0100
   From: Lorenzo Canapicchi <canapicchi_at_...>
Subject: Re: Slann necron

I Agree with You, maybe Necrons and Slann-Necrons are proper names to
use, simply like this, and they will be two different lists.

Robert McCord wrote:

>I would agree that a poll would be better then someone changing (or
>not changing) the name on whim BUT I don't think it's really the best
>or fairest. Remember it would give equal weight to those that play
>Slann/Necrons, Necron players, and those that never even face either.
>How to weight all these things? Heck I'm not that smart.
>
>My initial discovery and attraction to netepic, and my selling point
>to recruit new netepics is that it trys to accomodated all, often
>contrary, GW fluff. This is a great strength and a name change here
>would be abandoning this strength!
>
>Bob
>
>



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links



 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Jan 30 2006 - 16:48:57 UTC