Re: [NetEpic ML] Army cards

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:37:57 -0400

cibernyam wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I still prefer the pics rather than silouettes. But maybe it's just me.
>Anywy, both card sets could be compatible as long as data is correct.
>
>OTOH, Separate counters for hidden deployment is a must. We used to draw a
>non accurate map of the field (best description would be 'an intention of a
>map') to deploy.
>
>just my 3.14 cents
>
>Albert
>
>
>
Hi!

I agree with you Albert. The hidden deployment cards are a must, most
methods I have used are extrememly cumbersome and cards would make this
process so much easier.

While actual pics are nice, there are some techincal issues involved, as
in good painted minis, good pictures of them and of course file size. In
the end silhouttes do have major advantages over actual picutres.

Peter
Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 00:37:57 UTC