[NetEpic ML] Re: R: Vehicle close combat

From: Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:11:50 -0800

I don't see what was wrong with the AT system. Have the CAF broken into a
"they charge" score and a slash separaring the "get charged" score. That
way we can even potentially get rid of some special rules for doomrollers.

There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
     Cosmo, 'Sneakers'

----- Original Message -----
From: <hellreich_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 8:35 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: R: Vehicle close combat

What some people seem to forget is the fact that these models stand for
complete squads 20 to 100 men . Now if you tell me that if one or two squad
of of any armies finest foot troops can't take out one squad of tanks then
we better all run and hide. For the Nation that has all tanks on the battle
field will win. LOL didn't any one see what happed in Desert Strom.

I vote leave as is for if you send all tanks and no foot troops to support
them, then you will never make officer rank and stay a buck pvt. lol Tanks
were desinged for support rolls not to run people over, that is what drunk
drivers do. lol
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Peter Ramos
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 7:04 PM
  Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: R: Vehicle close combat


  Heheh, it seems that the tide is turning to leave as is, which is okay
since there was a bare majority to this anyway.

  Any more opinions for against.


>The first issue to resolve is how vehicles engage in close combat.

>Simply put, when a vehicle charges it uses the printed CAF listed in the
rules (overrun >attack). When the vehicle itself is charged use the half the
printed CAF's value (round >down).

I desagree because this change makes vehicules too vulnerable; usually
speaking about CAF we can immagine that it shows how hard their armor is in
close combat; in epic, generally, this factor is underestimated and we have
that most vehicules have a good save (i.e. 2+) but lower CAF (i.e. a land
raider has an armor of 2+ and a caf of +3), this fact, IMHO, rappresent the
vulnerability of the vehicule when assaulted all around and immobile, not
its real defence factor, if we consider a mobile vehicule this factor should
be rised.
IMHO if we want simulate the overrun attack we have to rise the basic CAF.



  eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
  www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Registering a domain name is quick and easy.
-- Talk to your group with your own voice!
-- http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=netepic&m=1
Received on Thu Feb 17 2000 - 05:11:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:51 UTC