[NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans

From: Weasel Fierce <septimus__at_...>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:31:07 GMT

>I personally like my staging regeneration but if it comes down to "one
>number, no variables" I'd throw in with 4+ repair for VSGs, maybe bump the
>Eldar repair rolls a bit and keep the orks the same.

Why not reintroduce the old "damage control" order from AT/SM????

Make regeneration 4+ and 3+ when not moving or firing.

>
>Ken
>---------------------------
>There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
>got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
>and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
> Cosmo, 'Sneakers'
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:15 PM
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
>
>
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > 1. Void shield repair is on a 3+ as well as repair
> >
> >
> > JS: I think this is too much. 4+ is sufficient for both.
> >
> >
> > 2. The reactor on the warlord should be a 1+
> >
> >
> > Definetely. The warlord hull is the crappiest in existence yet it's
>still
> > the most expensive.
> >
> > Jyrki Saari
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
> > Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to
>China.
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/950858148/
> >
> > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> > -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
>Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to China.
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/950858598/
>
>-- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
>-- http://www.egroups.com/docvault/netepic/?m=1
>

______________________________________________________
Received on Mon Feb 21 2000 - 15:31:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:52 UTC