[NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 7:47 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Titan revision: Eldar
> Hi!
>
> Moving along we'll now cover the eldar.
>
> Rember the newer rules where the holofield protection extends versus
> barrages too.
>
> Hulls
> Phantom 300, probaly needs to be 350 now at least
> Warlock 400, probaly needs to be 450 now at least
>
I disagree with both of these. The eldar titans are extremely vulnerable to
barrage.Upping the price would be unbalancing,too expensive.
> Weapons
> D-cannon 125, having used this, I think it should be pumped up to 150
yes,but get rid of the "first fire only" aspect of the weapon. No sane eldar
player will have a titan on first fire,and the idea of a eldar weapon that
*requires* the user to stand still is against every bit of fluff on the
eldar that exists.
> Heat lance 50, nice but short ranged
> Powerfist, 50 points
> Psycannon, 75 points
> Pulsar, 150 points
> Tremor cannon, 85 points
> Flamewind AA 50 points
too expensive for one shot. make it 50-60,but 2 shots.
> Las cannon wing 75
> Missile launcher wing 25 points
>
Trav
hikaru_at_...
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence;it is force! Like fire,it is
a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
George Washington
Received on Fri Mar 10 2000 - 07:27:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:53 UTC