[NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar

From: Travis Smart <Hikaru_at_...>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:54:13 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: Travis Smart <Hikaru_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 2:27 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 7:47 PM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Titan revision: Eldar
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Moving along we'll now cover the eldar.
> >
> > Rember the newer rules where the holofield protection extends versus
> > barrages too.
> >
> > Hulls
> > Phantom 300, probaly needs to be 350 now at least
> > Warlock 400, probaly needs to be 450 now at least
> >
>
> I disagree with both of these. The eldar titans are extremely vulnerable
to
> barrage.Upping the price would be unbalancing,too expensive.


I apologise for not reading that better....Ye gads,I sound like an idiot...
what I get for posting at 230 in the freaking am....


Trav
hikaru_at_...
 "Government is not reason; it is not eloquence;it is force! Like fire,it is
a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
 George Washington
Received on Fri Mar 10 2000 - 07:54:13 UTC