[NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar

From: Travis Smart <Hikaru_at_...>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:07:01 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: Butch Hobson <fog_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 11:44 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 7:16 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Titan revision: Eldar
>
>
> >I agree with Kelvin,
> >
> >but I think an interesting question has also been raised about the
> >D-cannon being able to fire in the advance phase.
> >
>
>
> It's just a stupid rule. Cobras and Warphunters don't have to, why should
a
> titan?
>
> b
>
>

Good point. surely a titan has more energy from its reactor then a cobra or
warp hunter does.


and i disagree with you saying the pulsars and wing wes are too cheap. You
imperial types have such a variety of weapon fits to choose from its
sickening. we sacrifice variety for punch.I would love to see some new
weapon fits for the eldar titans,while we are on the subject.

Trav
hikaru_at_...
 "Government is not reason; it is not eloquence;it is force! Like fire,it is
a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
 George Washington
Received on Fri Mar 10 2000 - 17:07:01 UTC