As a general rule, my gaming group has stated that as long as a commander is
inside his transport, the vehicle is considered a command unit. The moment
he unloads, the vehicle becomes a regular unit.
We adopted this rule from a battle repport in GW Space Marine Battles-book
published about a hundred yers ago. (Yarrick started the game in a
baneblade.)
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: Warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
Sent: 24. mars 2000 09:35
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Unit Coherency company cards comp
Hi Peter!
Are you sure about this? Consider the following:
1) The Battlewagon detachment card says that Battlewagons fight as PART
of the Nob unit.
2) Page 17, Special Rule, Command Units, states that " Each unit
consists of 1 or more troop stands plus the appropriate transport
vehicles.
3) Nobs without command vehicle transports, would have to place orders
for thier vehicles. That just doesn't seem right. Commanders ALWAYS
have command vehicles. It's not THAT good a deal.
4) Skullhammas would only be command vehicles, while the infantry Nobs
are loaded up. The moment, the infantry Nobs get off, the Skullhamma is
independent and will follow its OWN plan. That means NO first fire, in
the first fire phase, unless the Skullhamma stays loaded. Or, it didn't
move, which is just as bad.
Hey, if your Ork opponent wants to keep them loaded, so they can move
and first fire, let him. When you kill that 100pt. Super, it's going
down with 200+ pts. of Nobs.
What does everyone else think?
Warprat ;)
> > Do transports, bought for Nobs, become command vehicles?
>
> Hehehe, I'm old but not crazy. No way no how <grin>.
>
> Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn more with SmartPlanet. It's a new way of learning online.
SmartPlanet offers hundreds of courses to take on your time,
in your space. Join for FREE today!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1704/3/_/7255/_/953887146/
-- Create a poll/survey for your group!
--
http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=netepic&m=1
Received on Fri Mar 24 2000 - 09:02:59 UTC