Hi!
I would go with whats been said that they are command vehicles when the
command unit is in it, but not when the commander is unloaded and under no
circumstances the vehicle command troops.
Peter
> Hi Peter!
>
> Are you sure about this? Consider the following:
>
>
>
> 1) The Battlewagon detachment card says that Battlewagons fight as PART
> of the Nob unit.
>
> 2) Page 17, Special Rule, Command Units, states that " Each unit
> consists of 1 or more troop stands plus the appropriate transport
> vehicles.
>
> 3) Nobs without command vehicle transports, would have to place orders
> for thier vehicles. That just doesn't seem right. Commanders ALWAYS
> have command vehicles. It's not THAT good a deal.
>
> 4) Skullhammas would only be command vehicles, while the infantry Nobs
> are loaded up. The moment, the infantry Nobs get off, the Skullhamma is
> independent and will follow its OWN plan. That means NO first fire, in
> the first fire phase, unless the Skullhamma stays loaded. Or, it didn't
> move, which is just as bad.
>
> Hey, if your Ork opponent wants to keep them loaded, so they can move
> and first fire, let him. When you kill that 100pt. Super, it's going
> down with 200+ pts. of Nobs.
>
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Do transports, bought for Nobs, become command vehicles?
> >
> > Hehehe, I'm old but not crazy. No way no how <grin>.
> >
> > Peter
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 24 2000 - 21:47:30 UTC