Hi!
On average you are correct, GW has a lot of bias towards some armies and
makes them too cheap.
For all you math types out there, anyone want to tackle a formula for net
epic?
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: dardman <dardman_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 5:57 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: More stuff to argue..er.. I mean discuss about
> The Capital Imperialis should stay where it is point wise. I have played
> against it several times and have never destroyed it. It is a firepower
> magnet. Put 2 companies of Heavy IG and blast away. Not to mention that it
> does have some decent weaponry. I think it is a much better buy than a
titan
> and could actually give it a run for its money.
> I have used the formula calculator on a few units and found it to be a
> useless tool. Most of the units are less than their actual formula cost.
> This leads me to belive that our formula is incorrect or that GW
> guestimated costs through playtesting and army favaorites. It is only a
> guide in my point of view. I will calculate the Imperalis. My guess is
that
> it will be cheaper than the formula.
> My thoughts,
> Darius
>
>
> __________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 27 2000 - 20:08:19 UTC