[NetEpic ML] Re: APC and infantry saves

From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 19:56:57 -0500

Hi!

I'm afraid I dont understand you're point.

What I suggest is to give models with a fixed save the regular bail out save
AND their fixed save if the standard bail out save failes. Infantry without
fixed saves get a standard bail out save. If they happen to have a non-fixed
save they ONLY get the standard bail out save, non-fixed armor saves are not
strong enough to be taken into account in this context, the bail out save is
generous enough for these troops.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warprat" <warprat_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 7:17 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: APC and infantry saves


> Hi Peter!
>
> I thought the same as you, untill I thought about regular, unfixed
> saves.
>
> Terminators save on a 5+, others on a 6+. If the vehicle is destroyed
> by a +0 Mod weapon, regular saves should have a chance to apply. The
> fixed save, will stiil apply to the Termies, should the weapon mod. go
> high enough.
>
> In my opinion, armor should count for something, even if it is not
> strong enough to give a fixed save.
>
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I think it should be simple, regardless the source of the attack.
> >
> > Rules:
> >
> > 1. A transport vehicle fails it save and its destroyed each occupant
roll a
> > straight bail-out roll of 4+ which is modified by the armor save.
> >
> > 2. IF the infantry stand has a fixed save it may take that save if the
> > bail-out roll is failed.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > > Hi All!
> > >
> > >
> > > Bail-out procedure:
> > >
> > > 1) Resolve the Bail-out, on a 4+, using the Save Mod of the weapon.
> > >
> > > 1A) If the vehicle was destoyed by a barrage, troops that have
> > > succesfully Bailed-out, must make a save against the barrage.
> > >
> > > 2) If the Bail-out is failed, apply the same weapon attack to the
troops
> > > inside the vehicle.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What does everyone else think?
> > >
> > > Warprat ;)
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 03 2000 - 00:56:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:56 UTC