Hi
This is the best suggestion to bail out rules so far, but infantry with
armorsave should have a better chance of surviving the situation than those
without. Therefore I suggest that all inf with armorsaves get their regular
saves if the bail out fails.
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:pramos2_at_...]
Sent: 3. april 2000 01:46
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: APC and infantry saves
Hi!
I think it should be simple, regardless the source of the attack.
Rules:
1. A transport vehicle fails it save and its destroyed each occupant roll a
straight bail-out roll of 4+ which is modified by the armor save.
2. IF the infantry stand has a fixed save it may take that save if teh
bail-out roll is failed.
Peter
> Hi All!
>
>
> Bail-out procedure:
>
> 1) Resolve the Bail-out, on a 4+, using the Save Mod of the weapon.
>
> 1A) If the vehicle was destoyed by a barrage, troops that have
> succesfully Bailed-out, must make a save against the barrage.
>
> 2) If the Bail-out is failed, apply the same weapon attack to the troops
> inside the vehicle.
>
>
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I think thats what we should do. The basic rules apply to all and those
with
> > fixed saves get thier save if the basic roll fails.
> >
> > fair enough.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > > At 09.15 01/04/00 -0600, you wrote:
> > > >Hi!
> > > >
> > > >It would be nice to have this sort of rule. It doesn't add uneeded
> > > >complexity and would make it realistic. I have to agree that it
depends
> > on
> > > >what you get hit with too. Losing your rhino to bolter fire gives you
a
> > > >chance to escape better than a hit from a volcano.
> > > >
> > > >In order to have uniformity I'd phrase the rule as thus:
> > > >
> > > >Infantry bails out on a 4+, roll for each stand carried. This roll is
> > > >modified by the save modifier. So weapons with a modifier of 4 or
more
> > means
> > > >instant toast to the vehicle and transported troops.
> > > >
> > > >Units with fixed saves get a 4+ bail out save that is not modified.
> > > >
> > > >Hows that sound?
> > > >
> > > >Peter
> > > >
> > >
> > > Seems very good. However what about saying that units with fixed saves
> > > get both the 4+ modifiable bail and their save? Seems a bit more
realistic
> > > (I know, bad word ;) this way, and I don't think it would slow down
the
> > > game. Another tought: maybe template weapons should hit the infantry
while
> > > it jums out the vehicle. This will cover the Vortex too...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Be unpredictabe. If your opponent doesn't know what to expect from
you,
> > > he won't be able to counter-act poperly.
> > >
> > > Tactica F.I.Z.
> > > Book 2, Chapter 6
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> > >
> > >
> > > eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> > > www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get your bargains at AndysGarage.com!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/2579/3/_/7255/_/954713395/
> >
> > eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/
> > http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-Earn 300 Points from MyPoints.com for trying _at_Backup
Get automatic protection and access to your important computer files.
Install today:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2344/3/_/7255/_/954719200/
-- Create a poll/survey for your group!
--
http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=netepic&m=1
Received on Mon Apr 03 2000 - 10:27:35 UTC