RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Transport Vehicles

From: eivind borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 12:16:03 +0200

I'm not Jim either, but I think it is a good rule too. My gaming group has
used it for a while already, and it has not not imballanced the game.

Eivind

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: 1. april 2000 10:10
To: netepic_at_...
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Transport Vehicles


[snip]
> That being said, however, I could agree with an infantry bail-out on a
> 1-3 d6 roll, IF the roll was modifed by the weapon's save modifier.
> The roll should only be good against RANGED weapons.
>
>
> What do you think, Jim?
>

I'm not Jim ;) but I think this would be a very useful rule.

Jyrki Saari



> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
[snip]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your bargains at AndysGarage.com!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2579/3/_/7255/_/954576596/

-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
-- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
Received on Mon Apr 03 2000 - 10:16:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:56 UTC