Yes I think this will do it AGREE
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:21 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balance
>
> Hi!
>
> I have seen al the comments with great interest. I have also used the epic
> points formula on some slann units and found them to be under priced. The
> bottom line is that they are too cheap and perhaps my original points
costs
> was on the ball.
>
> Most prices for support cards were off by 50-75 points meaning the company
> cards are off from 100-225 points. So in fact some units do need a
> substancial points increase.
>
> It is much greater prefered to change points costs, but these are the
> changes I think should be done:
>
> 1. The nullify field HAS to shrink in size to just 6cm. I think this is a
> major complain from opponents and the 15cm distance is TOO much.
>
> 2. Warp field displacement shield. I have to agree that a 3+ fixed save
> followed by a 1+ save is again TOO MUCH. A standard 5+ or 4+ for special
> units is more than good enough.
>
> 3. Titan costs will not changed from what has been discussed, ony the rest
> of the army will.
>
> 4. Lets divide the slann army as follows:
>
> True slann, they are few and expensive, so regardless of army core you
> can get as much true slann as you can afford, they are the masters
> after all.
>
> Necron, you may take 25% of exodites and dracon
>
> Exodites and dracon, you may take 25% of necron
>
> 5. The self repair ability does not extend to CC.
>
> Is this acceptable?
>
> I will soon list alternate cost for slann units.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3555/3/_/7255/_/956766781/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Wed Apr 26 2000 - 23:30:41 UTC