Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balance

From: <hellreich_at_...>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:21:50 -0400

RE: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balanceMe either, but this is what seems to be the problem, them and some Necron but I think the 6cm thing will bring them down to play level. As for the Mechs LOL I see no problem not even at the points they are at now. You don't hear Ork and Eldar players crying about how hard it is to kill a Knight, but IG and SM players think they are fair, and fairly priced.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Peter Ramos
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 3:56 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balance


  Hi!

  Thats pretty much what I did second time around an increase of 50 points (some of 100) for most Necron. As for the Vanguard, i dont see what all the ruckus is about, they are 1000 points for 11 stands, although rather good ones, I dont think I will field them in small games, only in fairly large ones.
   
  Peter

     
    Agree LOL, just to let you know all Exodus units were copyed from other units in use by other armies. The Necron and True Slann foot troops are and can be the only problem. As for the Mechs and I'll hope all keep open mind, are really no stronger then Knights and when taking a Mech pod it is twice the cost so very fair. Mech support cards also cost more then Knight cards so again fair. I feel just simple things like dropping Null field to 6cm and upping Necron cards by 50pts will fix alot. As for the True Slann a company of leaders is maybe to much, and in my original thought for the Vanguard was to be just a leader for the Spawnguard. Plus being able to take it as a Special card. And I feel I'm right!!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Apr 27 2000 - 20:21:50 UTC