Stagadon vs. Leviathan

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 09:19:36 +0200

I remember someone (Peter?) mentioning that the Stagadon was
too cheap (at 300). If you compare it with the Squat Leviathan (at 350),
you'll see that the Leviathan is better (less move, but longer range,
larger troop carrying capabilities, always fires on FF and lotsa nice
bolters for those pesky inf charges :-) ). I don't think we should apply
the cost formula for Slann, but not for the other armies. Granted, the
Squats have cheap Preatorians, and all armies have in fact things
which are cheap compared to the formula. I just want to make sure
that the Slann revision is fair, and that they don't suddenly become
a "point cost formula" army, while the others aren't...
Seems to me that the point costs of the other armies are more or
less based on playtesting and hunches rather than the formula.
Granted, the Slann havn't been tested extensively, but i still think
it's better to test them more before we go overboard with the
cost....

Rune
Received on Wed May 03 2000 - 07:19:36 UTC