The stegadon is staying at 300 not to worry, just some small changes are
being done
----- Original Message -----
From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: <Netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:19 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Stagadon vs. Leviathan
> I remember someone (Peter?) mentioning that the Stagadon was
> too cheap (at 300). If you compare it with the Squat Leviathan (at 350),
> you'll see that the Leviathan is better (less move, but longer range,
> larger troop carrying capabilities, always fires on FF and lotsa nice
> bolters for those pesky inf charges :-) ). I don't think we should apply
> the cost formula for Slann, but not for the other armies. Granted, the
> Squats have cheap Preatorians, and all armies have in fact things
> which are cheap compared to the formula. I just want to make sure
> that the Slann revision is fair, and that they don't suddenly become
> a "point cost formula" army, while the others aren't...
> Seems to me that the point costs of the other armies are more or
> less based on playtesting and hunches rather than the formula.
> Granted, the Slann havn't been tested extensively, but i still think
> it's better to test them more before we go overboard with the
> cost....
>
> Rune
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *--- FREE VOICEMAIL FOR YOUR HOME PHONE! ---*
> With eVoice Now you can keep in touch with clients, vendors, co-workers,
> friends and family ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Sign Up Today for FREE!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3426/3/_/7255/_/957338430/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Wed May 03 2000 - 21:34:24 UTC