Re: [NetEpic ML] Stagadon vs. Leviathan

From: <hellreich_at_...>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:42:32 -0400

my point as well as yours !!!!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:47 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Stagadon vs. Leviathan


> All i wanted to say was : Don't apply the point cost formula to
> Slann, unless you do it to all the other armies as well. In all
> fairness, we need to work out the correct prices with
playtesting.
> I agree that some units are too cheap, but the Slann should have
> some that are, as all armies have. I suggest the Dracons and/or
> Exodus Slann should have a reasonably priced company card.
> If we're not going to use the formula, all we have to base the
> costs on are other armies' units and playtesting..
>
> Rune
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 2000-05-03 09:45
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Stagadon vs. Leviathan
>
>
>
> I do not think we need any further testing to see that the Slann in
general
> is too cheap.
>
> Eivind
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
> <mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
> Sent: 3. mai 2000 09:20
> To: 'Netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Stagadon vs. Leviathan
>
>
> I remember someone (Peter?) mentioning that the Stagadon was
> too cheap (at 300). If you compare it with the Squat Leviathan (at 350),
> you'll see that the Leviathan is better (less move, but longer range,
> larger troop carrying capabilities, always fires on FF and lotsa nice
> bolters for those pesky inf charges :-) ). I don't think we should apply
> the cost formula for Slann, but not for the other armies. Granted, the
> Squats have cheap Preatorians, and all armies have in fact things
> which are cheap compared to the formula. I just want to make sure
> that the Slann revision is fair, and that they don't suddenly become
> a "point cost formula" army, while the others aren't...
> Seems to me that the point costs of the other armies are more or
> less based on playtesting and hunches rather than the formula.
> Granted, the Slann havn't been tested extensively, but i still think
> it's better to test them more before we go overboard with the
> cost....
>
> Rune
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *--- FREE VOICEMAIL FOR YOUR HOME PHONE! ---*
> With eVoice Now you can keep in touch with clients, vendors, co-workers,
> friends and family ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. Sign Up Today for FREE!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3426/3/_/7255/_/957338430/
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/3426/3/_/7255/_/957338430/>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _____
>
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/2380/3/_/7255/_/957339779/>
> <http://adimg.egroups.com/img/2380/3/_/7255/_/957339779/>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> eGroups eLerts
> It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3863/3/_/7255/_/957340113/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Wed May 03 2000 - 21:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:59 UTC