Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic what form will it take.?

From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:41:17 -0500

Hi!

I have to agree here, Warmaster is a surprisingly good game. It is a little
in lack of detail but overall the mechanics are pretty solid.

Of course it remains to be seen how much t will last. I have heard and read
about this not being a short term game, but seeing is beleiving with GW so
we have to wait and see.

They have however stuck to a pretty fast paced release schedule which is
very good and mostly everything should be out by July.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Luca Lettieri <magnus_at_...>
To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Friday, May 12, 2000 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic what form will it take.?


>> 2) Or release a simple stripped down version of the game (Warmaster)
>
>
>I don't know why most of the list members seem to dislike Warmaster
>but, for my part, I think it's, hands down, the best product GW
>released since Epic 2nd edition.
>
>It's not a "realistic" wargame, all right, and it was never intended
>to be. But it's simple, elegant, fun and besides, it places
>deployment, movement and unit employment (aka "tactic") above
>everything else. Gone are the days of Warhammer super-duper-cheese
>Heroes/Monsters and combinatorics game type. Finally a GW game in
>which he who has the most brain wins.
>
>
>Luca Lettieri
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Remember four years of good friends, bad clothes, explosive chemistry
>experiments.
>http://click.egroups.com/1/4051/5/_/7255/_/958130125/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Fri May 12 2000 - 13:41:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:59 UTC