Hi!
According to the fluff the Necron are the most numerous since they have
helped the slann stave off the tyranid. Having said that its no biggie to
leave things as they are since the cards reflect army organization and
doctrine and not how many beings a race has.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0
> I disagree. If you can make a robot which fights as well as a human,
> why not mass produce them? Why even risk human lives if a robot
> can do the fighting? The armies of the world would looove to get
>their
> hands on a fighting robot. The Slann would make enough Necrons so
> that fewer Slann would have to fight and lose their lives, after
>all, isnt
> that the purpose of the Necrons?
>
> Rune
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hellreich_at_... [mailto:hellreich@...]
> Sent: 2000-05-22 16:58
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0
>
> No this is wrong, True Slann would be more in number then
>Necron, But would
> be few in number compared to Exodus, Necron and True Slann
>would be few in
> number compared to Exodus. The True Slann would use Necron
>intell for fast
> hard hitting tanks and other support weapons or infantry. No
>need to mass
> produce something that can repair itself ( {like this} damn
>human children
> hit the Necron company hard only half seemed to repair
>itself, after this
> battle your greatness we will need to make another 100 to
>replace them ).
> This showes that the Slann would only make as many as
>needed, not a whole
> planets worth, there own little perfect race.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thats a good point. Any other opinions on this? It's
>easily changed. Also
> > the price would go down and perhpas make them fielded more
>often.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
> > To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 6:24 AM
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0
> >
> >
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >I was looking at the newest Slann rules, and something
>struck me as odd.
> > >If the Slann are supposed to be so rare, and the Necrons
>so numerous,
> > >why are the Slann 3 detachments per CC, and the Necrons
>only 2? I agree
> > >that the Necrons should be 2 per CC, but shouldn't the
>Slann be 2 also?
> > >
> > >Just a thought.
> > >
> > >Rune
> > >
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Now the best and coolest websites come right to you based
>on your
> > >unique interests. eTour.com is surfing without searching.
> > >And, it's FREE!
> > >http://click.egroups.com/1/3013/5/_/7255/_/958994634/
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/5/_/7255/_/959002772/
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
> _____________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Missing old school friends? Find them here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4055/5/_/7255/_/959007366/
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Save 75% on Products!
>Find incredible deals on overstocked items with Free shipping!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/4013/5/_/7255/_/959007671/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 22 2000 - 16:18:06 UTC