R: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.

From: Bernasconi Davide <bernasconi_at_...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 14:56:57 +0200

I don't think that you have to be allowed to mix IG/SM/TG, each army has
different features and different costs (of course).

The best thing when I play IG/SM/TG (I own an army for each one) is to try
to use the best of them, not using different for units to recover weakness.

Just my 50 lire.

Davide

>
>
> I agree, there should be some rules regarding how
> they can be
> mixed. I'll leave it up to the experienced IG/SM/TG
> gamers out
> there to figure out exactly how though :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 2000-05-24 14:43
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.
>
>
>
> I think the SoB looks like the SM, only weaker. I would not
> field them in
> Epic without the support of some heavy firepower like IG SH,
> IG artillery or
> titans.
>
> This brings another question to mind, IG & SM has traditionally been
> considered as one army, free to mix, TG has after some
> discussion not been
> allowed to mix with the other imperial lists.
>
> This is two polarized points of view I dont like. I think
> there should be
> allowed to mix troops from the lists, but within some restrictions.
>
> Maybe a core-force of one list, say 70 - 75% with additions
> from the other
> lists by 25 - 30%?
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 12:56:57 UTC