Hi!
Another argument for smaller company cards is less figures to buy. Overall
some care was taken with this point, especially to guarantee that depending
on the amount of figures that comes in the blister to equate that as closely
to the actual composition as possible so as not to obligate people to spend
to much.
I suggest Rune to try the Slann infantry companies in the two detachment
size, just lower cost by a third and let me know how it goes. I admit that
sometimes I designate the company strength on the amount of figures I happen
to have (which tends to be excessive to put it mildly), thus the larger
slann company.
By the way is the slann infantry company card compositon the only one that
needs looking over? are there others? Let me know.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 6:39 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions about Slann 4.0
> As i recall, i argued for not changing the stats, but rather to
>increase
> the prices (with you and Nils at least). This isn't what's
really
>happened.
> Prices have gone up and stats have gone down (on some units).
I'm
> not saying that this is a bad thing, it's probably balanced
Slann
>more.
> My gripe is, as you've pointed out, with the composition.
Whether
>you
> or any other players have experienced that army composition has
>changed
> doesn't make me feel any better about it. Sure, we're all in the
>same boat,
> lotta good that does me ;)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>Sent: 2000-05-24 12:09
>To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions about Slann 4.0
>
>
>
>Rune, I have one question: Where are your consistency?
>
>When we went into the process of revising the Slann army, I argued for
>reduction of stats and not increasing the prices. You fought this by all
>means, and the other people on the list agreed with your opinion.
>
>Now you have gotten it your way, and are still whining. Off course you have
>to leave some units behind, we all do! Its only natural when prices go up.
>
>I never use all of my units neither does Nils. In fact, years went by
before
>I fielded my titan, because my oponent didn't have the means to take it
out.
>For the same reason its just recently I began to field T-hawks, and I have
>never used them all.
>
>I'm sure all people on the list have units they seldom use. Netepic will
>always be a game in change.
>
>Eivind
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
><mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
>Sent: 23. mai 2000 21:48
>To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions about Slann
>4.0
>
>
> I don't necessarily want it back as a CC, i'm just throwing
> questions and ideas around. One of the reasons im asking
> about this, is that i've already bought and painted a lot of
> the Slann stuff. If i want to field heavy mechs now, i can't field
> any other mechs. I just bought 8, cause they're so damn
> expensive. Not to mention the postage....
> I don't think it's fair to make a set of rules, and then when
> people like me rush out to buy the mini's, you change the
> army composition. Sure, i thought that the stats might
> change some, but not the other stuff. Now i have 32 Necron
> Scarabs and about 6-7000 points of Necron inf which i'll never
> get to use.
> It's easy for the ones who live in the U.S, but for us it's a lot
> of money. If you double the price on every mini you bought,
> you'll come close to what we in Norway,at least, have to
> pay for it. SO, stop messing around with army composition!!
>
> Rune
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hellreich [ mailto:hellreich_at_...
><mailto:hellreich_at_...> ]
>
> Sent: 2000-05-23 21:32
>
> To:netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More
>
>questions about Slann 4.0
>
> no this is a bad idea, just support, this is a Heavies roll
>
>support. Rune is
> a power gamer and is looking for lope holes to play the army
>
>as such. We
> have taken it from him and now he wants it back
>
> NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions
>
>about Slann 4.0
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > There was a problem in having Bullfrog compnaies since
>
>they were deemed
> too
> > powerful for full company strength. The only thing I can
>
>think of is
> making
> > a vanguard mech special card.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
>
> > To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions
>
>about Slann 4.0
> >
> >
> > > Yep, that's my gripe :-)
> > > Why shouldn't the most powerful Mechs get a chance
>
> > > to have a Vanguard without having to field another
>
> > > mech CC? Are there no commanders who want to do
>
> > > it? ;)
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [ mailto:pramos2_at_...
><mailto:pramos2_at_...> ]
>
> > > Sent: 2000-05-23 15:07
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More
>
> > >questions about Slann 4.0
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > They are no support cards, so they don't get a Vanguard
>
>Mech
> > >anymore. They
> > > would have to draw on another company's vanguard.
>
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
><mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 7:36 AM
> > > To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] More questions about Slann 4.0
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the Bullfrogs have a chance to have a Vanguard
>
> > > Mech with them without taking another Mech Company Card?
>
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > "Use it or lose it" - Your $5 expires in 7 days
>
> > > CDs, movies, books, or video games already half price
>
> > > _at_ Half.com - click here
> > > http://click.egroups.com/1/4508/5/_/7255/_/959085396/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/4508/5/_/7255/_/959085396/>
>
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > eGroups
> > > free, easy email groups
> > > Start a new email group today at
> > > http://click.egroups.com/1/3949/5/_/7255/_/959087319/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/3949/5/_/7255/_/959087319/>
>
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Suddenly a new site somewhere between Amazon and eBay
>
> > >Half.com - buy or sell CDs, books, movies, video games
>
>all half price
> > >$5 off first order, 7 days only - click here
>
> > > http://click.egroups.com/1/4510/5/_/7255/_/959087545/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/4510/5/_/7255/_/959087545/>
>
> >
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker
>
>combinations.
> > Remember the good 'ol days
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959092071/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959092071/>
>
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
> _____________________________________________
>
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
>
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
><http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free, easy, fun!
> Email groups at eGroups
> Start one today at
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3946/5/_/7255/_/959110268/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/3946/5/_/7255/_/959110268/>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
>Remember the good 'ol days
>http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959111308/
><http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959111308/>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _____
>
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/4324/5/_/7255/_/959162820/>
>
><http://adimg.egroups.com/img/4324/5/_/7255/_/959162820/pr_camera_468_12k.g
i
>f>
>
> _____
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Did you know you're using eGroups now?
>Start a free email group today at
>http://click.egroups.com/1/3947/5/_/7255/_/959168396/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 13:27:08 UTC