The Sisters army is probably to weak on its own, I really liked the
suggestion of making Predators available to them. This would add some
balance. I think the need to have access to titans as well, that would at
least give them some firepower.
However, the theme of this army should be preserved! Light armour, fast
units, quite numerous and extencive use of flamers!
I've made som notes, and will give you a report after the game this weekend!
Nils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ramos [SMTP:pramos2_at_...]
> Sent: 24. mai 2000 15:21
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial
> lists.
>
> Hi!
>
> As the rules stand "allies", even amongst Imperial units is strictly
> optional. Therefore IG, space marines and sisters of battle are their own
> armies and no "mixing" is generaly allowed unless the players agree to use
> those optional rules. As with all allies the 25% rules is the simplest way
> to handle it.
>
> In the case of sisters of battle I think steps should be taken to make it
> its own self contained army with support armor and such. Feel free to
> "break" the confines of the offficial background since we pretty much are
> making our own game and rules anyway. So if they need tanks, titans or
> whatever the army list should have provisions to make these available so a
> "pure" sisters of battle army is feasable.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernasconi Davide <bernasconi_at_...>
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 7:59 AM
> Subject: R: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.
>
>
> >I don't think that you have to be allowed to mix IG/SM/TG, each army has
> >different features and different costs (of course).
> >
> >The best thing when I play IG/SM/TG (I own an army for each one) is to
> try
> >to use the best of them, not using different for units to recover
> weakness.
> >
> >Just my 50 lire.
> >
> >Davide
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I agree, there should be some rules regarding how
> >> they can be
> >> mixed. I'll leave it up to the experienced IG/SM/TG
> >> gamers out
> >> there to figure out exactly how though :)
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> >> Sent: 2000-05-24 14:43
> >> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> >> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I think the SoB looks like the SM, only weaker. I would not
> >> field them in
> >> Epic without the support of some heavy firepower like IG SH,
> >> IG artillery or
> >> titans.
> >>
> >> This brings another question to mind, IG & SM has traditionally been
> >> considered as one army, free to mix, TG has after some
> >> discussion not been
> >> allowed to mix with the other imperial lists.
> >>
> >> This is two polarized points of view I dont like. I think
> >> there should be
> >> allowed to mix troops from the lists, but within some restrictions.
> >>
> >> Maybe a core-force of one list, say 70 - 75% with additions
> >> from the other
> >> lists by 25 - 30%?
> >>
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Did you know you're using eGroups now?
> >Start a free email group today at
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/3947/5/_/7255/_/959173146/
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
> Remember the good 'ol days
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959174600/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 13:32:22 UTC