Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] silly question?

From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:58:25 -0700

Hi Peter!

OK, here's a REALLY stupid question:

If a Snotling is not considered an instant Close Combat assault, but one
that lingers on, why can't defending units on First Fire shoot at the
Snotlings?


Another question:

Can the Shokk Attack gun be Snap Fired? If so, it can now tie up vast
amounts of enemy formations, far beyond it's point value. Kind of makes
the Traktor Kannon look like a VERY poor cousin. ;)


Thanks Peter!

Warprat ;)





Peter Ramos wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> <grin> this one takes me back a long ways. The answer is yes, although with
> our new pinning system only units classified as infantry would be pinned,
> all others, vehicles, knights and titans would not be pinned and thus be
> able to fire on advance.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 6:47 PM
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] silly question?
>
> Hi Peter!
>
> So, if a Shokk Attack stand sends a Snotling to pin a troop stand on
> Advance fire, the defending stand on Advance does not get to fire?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Hmm....you phrase the question quite differently than I imagined, but if
> the
> > unit was pinned regardless if it won its combat or not it loses its fire.
> >
> > I went over the core rules and its either poorly worded or not referenced
> > exactly in these words. This is an interpretation that originated from the
> > old GW Q&A of Space marine, but I have been assuming it was there clearly
> > and its not.
> >
> > So I'll add it in the corresponding section. Once again the list proves
> its
> > worth!
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 5:33 PM
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] silly question?
> >
> > Hi Peter!
> >
> > Where in the rules does it state that troops on Advance must lose thier
> > fire, if they are not currently pinned by attacking units, in the
> > Advance Phase?
> >
> > I'm trying to find it. What did I miss? Is there some rule that infers
> > this? Or is this more of a personel interpretation on your part.
> >
> > It's fine either way, I just want to understand.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Warprat ;)
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Keep in touch with eGroups,
> > Keep your long distance bills lower with beMANY!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/4120/5/_/7255/_/961021422/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > How about a flat, no-fee long distance rate of 6.7� per min. -
> > or less? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you rates which
> > fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/3820/5/_/7255/_/961024345/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Missing old school friends? Find them here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/5534/5/_/7255/_/961025909/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vegas, Baby!
> Great deals on airfare, hotels and
> car rentals from Expedia.com!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/5206/5/_/7255/_/961028625/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Thu Jun 15 2000 - 00:58:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:03 UTC