Re: [NetEpic ML] silly question?

From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 22:28:44 -0700

Brother,

Let us unite!


Thanks for posting your obviously superior opinion. ;)

Warprat ;)




Albert Farr� Benet wrote:

>
> OK, OK, but just imagine four terminator stands vs four gretchin stands
> charging into CC.
> Twenty cold-blooded elite veteran marines in terminator-one-inch-thick
> armour forced to waste their twenty sustained fire bolters (not to say
> assault cannons and cyclone launchers) because a pack of stupid greenies who
> can't tie their shoes by themselves come shouting, ready to die with their
> 4+ Morale ( or should I point 5+ ? I remember gretchins being stupid and
> insanly coward not suicidal fanatics ).
>
> Under old rules, there was also a very common tactic with SM. You dropped
> your troops behind enemy lines with gunshps, and if gunships survived next
> turn, they could be used to pin vehicles by the rear side so they couldn't
> fire at all: you loose 1 VP he wastes all his firing dice and becomes a
> sitting duck ready to be fryed in Advance fire. Cheezie, huh?
>
> That's not fair at all. If rules are not Ok they should be changed.
>
> And yes, those were very extreme examples, but think about it.
>
Received on Sun Jun 18 2000 - 05:28:44 UTC