Re: [NetEpic ML] Another Slann discrepancy..

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 10:41:09 -0400

Hi!

The cost is 150 points if you think its too high it could be 100 as I
originally suggested it.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karlsen Rune" <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 3:18 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Another Slann discrepancy..


> Forgot to ask how much they cost btw. These are one-shot
> items, and should not be priced too high. Compare with
> one-shot missiles please :-)
> If they're priced too high, noone will ever use them either.
>
> Rune
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 2000-08-25 09:06
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Another Slann discrepancy..
>
> There is a discrepancy i've wondered about for a long time.
> The wording on the Scarab Protectors (quote) :
>
> "Has the Nullifying Field, but affects only the attacked
> unit and
> reduces the armor value of it by 1D3 instead of by 2 (this
> is
> rolled once and effects all models in the squad an equal
> amount)."
>
> No nullify field has an armor reducing effect. Is this
> supposed to
> be CAF? This error has propagated from the earliest version
> of the rules up until v4.0. It's time to clarify! :-)
>
> Rune
>
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Sat Aug 26 2000 - 14:41:09 UTC