Yupp, but I guess we could live with one type of panzer II anyway. I think
that once we have decided on the core issues we should develope some basic
units (infantry???), with wich we could compare all other units. It seems
that the most of us would like to use the d10 in order to increase the
possible variations. I say, let's stick to the d10, and move onwards!
German panzer could be divided into Sturmgeschutz, T38's, Panzer I, II, III,
IV (With and without added side armour?), Panthers (and jagt Panther?) and
finally the Tiger. Making general assumtions regarding each unit, leaving
the individual weapons/armour on each sub model out of the equation.
Because if we get into lenghty debate on the different guns, armour thikness
and so on we will loose momentum fast, and probably never lift off.....
Nils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: deaconblue3_at_... [SMTP:deaconblue3@...]
> Sent: 4. september 2000 19:05
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic WW1
>
>
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/6142/6/_/7255/_/968088452/>
> where you set the price
> <http://adimg.egroups.com/img/6142/6/_/7255/_/968088452/>
> eGroups <http://www.egroups.com/> My Groups
> <http://www.egroups.com/mygroups> | netepic Main Page
> <http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic> | Start a new group!
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/8150/6/_/7255/_/968088453/>
>
>
> As for the various tanks and guns, we need only cover the main basic
> types.
> No reason to go into every imaginable variation of the Pz IV for example.
>
> -->Not that much variation in the PZ-IV, or even in the PZ-III's. The
> Pz-II's for example, can be broken down into three variants: long
> barreled, short barreled, and flammpanzers. Same for Pz-IV's.
>
> Josh R
>
> Minister for General Mayhem
> "Don't let the bastards grind you down." Gen. Joseph Stilwell
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Tue Sep 05 2000 - 06:48:43 UTC