Hi
Dont think so, a teleporting Woulfguard-detachment costs 375 (same as a
normal WG specialcard) so if you pay for the more for the ability than all
other, you should get the ability.
Deathwingtermies DO break, they just dont check morale. Normal termies fail
moral only 1 in 6 times, so I dont see any reason why The Dark Angels should
be cut off from the ability to teleport in.
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_...]
Sent: 5. september 2000 11:15
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Terminators & transports
Hi,
This should only apply to the Chapters without special rules for
Terminators. I play the spacewolves and I guess that to teleport a group of
woul guards into the midtst of fighting would be kind of cheesy. Same goes
for Dark Angels and their never breaking Deathwing!
Opinions?
Nils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind borgeteien [SMTP:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 5. september 2000 11:15
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Terminators & transports
>
> Hi!
>
> OK. It seems that we can agree that a detachment of 4 teleporting termies
> can be included as a specialcard.
>
> Cost 350
> BP 3
> Morale 1
>
> Concearning the Crusader we can give it 4 bolters to hit on 6+. (I powered
> it up to make it more expencive, but 4 bolters works just as well.)
>
> I think we should keep the 2 transport capability, I dont really see what
> we
> can tranport in 3s....?
>
> Eivind
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BRUNTZ François (DSIT-EG) [mailto:francois.bruntz_at_...]
> Sent: 4. september 2000 15:34
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Terminators & transports
>
>
>
> Salut,
>
> Tu as écrit :
>
> > I can live with 4 termies to be teleported to the batleground
> >as a specialcard. That would allow players to use them offensively
> >without dibling to much with gameballance.
>
> I don't think that giving the 'teleporation' to a whole terminator
> detachment or company as a free support card will unbalance the game.
> After
> all you'll will still have the same break point and termies will not have
> the support of their land raiders...
>
> >I have also done some research on the new Land Raider Crusader,
> >and here is my thoughts:
> >The Crusader is originally bult for the Black Templars SM Chapter
> >to carry their termies (relativley) safe right up to the enemies
> position.
> >They have replaced the lascannon with bolters to give close support to
> >the infantry once unloaded. They also have an increased transport
> >capability, 8 termies in stead of 5 whitch is the usual in 40K. These
> >tanks are uncommon outside the Black Templars.
> >I think a translation to netepicrules should look something like this:
>
> >Special Card to replace 7 Land Raiders in a Terminatorcompany
>
> Special card for non Black Templars and support card for Black Templars?
>
> >Cost 100
> >(I ran the stats below thruogh the formula, and got the price to
> >be 150 cheaper than the original 7 Land Raiders, so you are in a
> >way paying 250 for the special card.)
> >Move 25
> >Save 3 (The crusader is lightlier armored to gain speed)
> >CAF +3
> >5 Bolters of 15 cm hits on 6+ (2 on right & left side, 1 on turret on
> top)
> >1 Hvy bolter of 25 cm hits on 5+ (Mounted in front of the crusader)
>
> Wahoo! This is a huge firepower? What about 4 bolters, range 15cm, hit on
> 6+. Or two bolters, range 15cm, hit on 5+...
>
> > Transport capability of 2 infantrystands.
>
> Well, if you keep a Transport(2) there would have no interest in building
> Crusaders...
>
>
> François Bruntz
> ---------------
> The Laïtus Prime Tribune
> Epic 40k, NetEpic, Space Marine/Titan Legion, Epic Escarmouches
> http://www.geocities.com/fbruntz
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> ###########################################
>
> This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft
> Exchange
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to
http://www.F-Secure.com/
Received on Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:46:18 UTC