Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Kel's take on Chaos

From: Thomas Wildman <tnrw00_at_...>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:51:23 -0500

I agree here. It would be better to allow use of some IG units to be
fielded by the renegades than still allow Chaos to field a complete IG ally
army without limitations(the way SM was).
Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: Kelvin <kx.henderson_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Kel's take on Chaos


>
> At 11:43 AM 9/4/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hear Hear!!!!!
> >
> >We really don't want to fiddle to much with the armies!!!! The balance of
> >this game is a frail thing indeed!!!! Look at Slann.... our first buildt
> >from scratch Army, it has caused considerable debate both on this list
and
> >in our gaming group!!!! And believe me, balance is the key factor!!!!
>
> And believe me, balance is what I want to keep with these Chaos lists,
> too. I'm not proposing sweeping changes with new units popping up here,
> there and everywhere, just a re-structure of the existing Chaos forces to
> allow people to field Chaos armies with a different theme than a Daemon
> army. With the Chaos Marine List, I would only propose some special new
> units for SPECIFIC Marine Legions, such as Iron Warriors Siege Marine or
> World Eaters Berserkers. These would ONLY be able to be fielded by the
> specific Legion and no other Marine Company.
>
> With the Renegade list, we could allow SOME IG gear to be taken by the
> Cultist Companies ONLY to show that they are defectors from the Imperial
> Forces. Trust me, I don't want Chaos to turn into a shooting army over
> being a run-across-the-field-and-kill army at all. I like them as they
are.
>
>
> -Kelvin....
>
> =========================================
> When you're feeling down
> remember that you are unique.
> Just like everyone else.
> =========================================
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 05 2000 - 22:51:23 UTC