Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...> wrote:
My Groups | netepic Main Page | Start a new group!
Hi!
and theres only 4 of them that can shoot out no big deal and they should keep there 3+ 2D6 armor save
This is precisely why the occupant should be vulnerable to it when the Imperator has no shields, its not a sure thing. It needs to land on the titan and then hit on a 3+ for those troops in the bastions only, the troops up abpve are immune.
When you realize all that is involved the troops in the imperator's bastions are well protected without making them immune.
IN the case of the mega-gargant any or the onboard troops may be affected if hit on a 3+ by a rad-bomb because there are no overly protected areas like in the Imperator.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: quester
To: netepic egroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 2:44 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] the wimpy rad bomb
Hi guys
i just looke at the rules for the rad bomb it doesnot hit everything under it !!!!!!!!!
it hits things under it on a roll of 3+ , with a wimpy -1 save mod. yea its a 12cm blast but its no big badass weapon like you all talk it up as
it will miss the whole dam titan 1/3 of the time lol LOL even if its under the template.......LOL
it has to be the worst one shot missile in the game.....................lol
go for it roll to hit the troops in the Imp.titan give them there 4+2D6 armor save(that they have ) and blacken some paint in the titan if you can LOL
what a pitiful weapon you need to give it something LOL
no wonder you guys want this so much
hell go for the flame weapons to the same way, roll to hit , 4+2d6 armor save, and burn some paint have fun
"Is it time to play?"
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
"Is it time to play?"
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
Received on Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:22:32 UTC