Re: [NetEpic ML] the wimpy rad bomb

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 20:37:40 -0400

Hi!

I mentioned previously that it was NOT necessary to apply fortification
rules to the bastions. Leave the rules as they are with the only
clarification that when unshielded the troops in the bastions ONLY could be
subject to weapons that ignore cover ONLY if they hit. The infantry gets no
saves when hit. Keep in mind this will apply to a few weapons in very
limited circumstances.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "warprat" <warprat_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] the wimpy rad bomb


>
> Boys, your killing me!
>
>
> Can we, please, just solve the problem with troops being able to attack
> without retaliation. IE: The Imperitor, the Capitol Imperialis. Are
> there others?
>
> Did ANYONE read my fine note about the battlements NOT being gun ports?
> Does ANYBODY even care?
>
> Could someone, anyone, please explain how the pictures in the books,
> justify a 4+ save for fortifications?
>
> Thankyou, ANYONE, for a reponse on these issues!
>
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yup, fort rules dont need to apply, that would make the couple of guys
> > in the bastion unhitable.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > OK peter
> >
> > the rad bomb, and flamer weapons and there are 4
> > stands that are hitable with the bastions 3+ 2D6
> > armor save is that right leave the forts rules out
> > of it
> >
> > this works for me i ve no problem with this
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Mon Sep 18 2000 - 00:37:40 UTC