RE: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:12:12 +0200

Well, in the last battle against IG, the Necrons took
a pounding. Just shows you that statitics aren't always
trustworthy :)

-----Original Message-----
From: warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
Sent: 10. oktober 2000 12:13
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?


Hi Rune!

The result is very bad, for the Imperials. Sorry!


Warprat ;)


Karlsen Rune wrote:
>
> Is the cost unbalanced? If you take 600 points of CC SM forces and
> pitch them against the Necrons, what is the result?
>
> Rune
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> Sent: 10. oktober 2000 11:55
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
>
> Hi Nils!
>
> Are you sure about the regeneration? I was thinking the same thing as
> you, BUT I couldn't find it in the rules. Anyway, very few Necrons were
> killed by CC.
>
> Even if -1 surprise mod is not used, and the Necrons killed in CC do not
> regenerate, the end result is unballanced.
>
> Warprat ;)
>
> nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two points, first Necrons killed in CC doesn't regenerate, secondly
> > Hellreich/Darius mentioned thet the -1 to CAF modifyer for units charged
> by
> > mechs popping out of the warp, was due to the size of the mech! So we
have
> > do not apply that penalty to units charget by warping Necron Assault
> > warriors.
> >
> > Nils
> >
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Tue Oct 10 2000 - 10:12:12 UTC