I really don't consider the warp jump unbalancing, and ive really
only tried to warp jump once past 40cms. The thing is, if only
one of the stands fails the additional roll on this, the whole
detachment stops, so you have to be pretty lucky to make a warp
jump of 60 cms (which i didnt). I rather think that adding
transports to the Assault Necrons would be unbalancing. They'd get
a much higher breakpoint, but not that many more VP's, and
accordingly would be harder to take out. They'd also get 10cms
further move on charge (and lets face it, putting them on anything
other than charge is ludicrous). So, with transports, they're not
slow moving at all, but faster and more deadly...Just my opinion..
Rune
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 11. oktober 2000 00:34
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Slann victorious again?
Hi!
Question: do you really consider this ability unbalancing? I'm not so
inclined but you have used them more than I, also if we don't give it to
them, they'll probably need some cards with transports, which is not bad,
but more work.
Let me know.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: hellreich [mailto:hellreich_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:26 PM
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
Necron Infantry should not be able to warp jump, they did not have this
before and some how it has snuck in. They should be slow moving troops, that
have to spend points on transports to move fast this is were the messup is.
As for your math it is a good point be a febble one at that, try this one
and tell me who wins 600 pts of Bloodletters to 600 pts of SM forces. these
guys are about the same as Necron but they get to regen in CC.
----- Original Message -----
From: warprat <warprat_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
> Hi Rune!
>
> The result is very bad, for the Imperials. Sorry!
>
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
> Karlsen Rune wrote:
> >
> > Is the cost unbalanced? If you take 600 points of CC SM forces and
> > pitch them against the Necrons, what is the result?
> >
> > Rune
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> > Sent: 10. oktober 2000 11:55
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
> >
> > Hi Nils!
> >
> > Are you sure about the regeneration? I was thinking the same thing as
> > you, BUT I couldn't find it in the rules. Anyway, very few Necrons were
> > killed by CC.
> >
> > Even if -1 surprise mod is not used, and the Necrons killed in CC do not
> > regenerate, the end result is unballanced.
> >
> > Warprat ;)
> >
> > nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Two points, first Necrons killed in CC doesn't regenerate, secondly
> > > Hellreich/Darius mentioned thet the -1 to CAF modifyer for units
charged
> > by
> > > mechs popping out of the warp, was due to the size of the mech! So we
have
> > > do not apply that penalty to units charget by warping Necron Assault
> > > warriors.
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Wed Oct 11 2000 - 06:26:43 UTC