Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann probable change.

From: peter ramos <ramospeter_at_...>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:21:22 EDT

Hi!

wjile hitting for each model is more realistic, I suspect that one roll for
the whole unit is better game mechanic. Let me know.

Peter


>From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann probable change.
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:15:10 -0000
>
>--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "peter ramos" <ramospeter_at_h...> wrote:
> >
>The disruptor missiles. Nils and I wil have a game next week to check
>out if we rather should have one roll pr detachment under the
>template rather than each stand.
>
>We let you know our conclusion
>
>Eivind
>Hi!
> >
> > Yes, well leave them in the optimal section, and we will make sure
>the -1CAF
> > does not apply.
> >
> > Everyone else agree?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > >From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_e...>
> > >Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > >To: "'netepic_at_egroups.com'" <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > >Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Slann probable change.
> > >Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:16:26 +0200
> > >
> > >Hi :)
> > >
> > >1. Yes, they arent really needed, although they are rather cool.
> > >Leave them as optional?
> > >
> > >2. Agreed, although the Necron Assaults would not incur the -1CAF
> > >penalty the mechs do due to their size.
> > >
> > >Rune
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_h...]
> > >Sent: 11. oktober 2000 15:06
> > >To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > >Subject: [NetEpic ML] Slann probable change.
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >It seems that some of the ideas I put in have favor amongst the
>slann
> > >players. Can the major slann players agree on the following:
> > >
> > >1. Scarabs cards get fused with necron assault, their stats costs
>and
> > >everything else stays the same
> > >
> > >2. they keep their warp jump with the rules already in place for
>slann
> > >mechs
> > >
> > >I have to agree with Rune that we need to stop making changes, I
>think the
> > >Slann are where they need to be and local house rules can patch
>things to
> > >taste. the above are pretty minor changes, actually more like
> > >clarifications
> > >
> > >since most have used the jump rules anyway.
> > >
> > >Is this acceptable?
> > >
> > >It seems this will be the last change since no complaints about
>other units
> > >have arisen amongst the slann players.
> > >
> > >Let me know what everyone thinks.
> > >
> > >Peter
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
>____
> > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>http://www.hotmail.com.
> > >
> > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > >http://profiles.msn.com.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
>______________________________________________________________________
>___
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > http://profiles.msn.com.
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Received on Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:21:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:09 UTC