Hi!
I can live with the CAF decrease, I think a +3 sounds fine, +1 for the
standard non-assault necron.
Peter
>From: "hellreich" <hellreich_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Do we need to change anything?
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:18:08 -0400
>
>LOL :-) yes it is a mess, well lets look at it this way we can keep it the
>same right now. But, do Necron really need to have a +5 CAF, I think this
>is
>alittle over board, yes I know they are few in numbers, but, the Radiers
>should be the main cannon fodder for the Necron army not the elite Assult
>troops. As I see it with the Null field the Necron Assult should have a
>+3-4
>CAF then with the null field they would still be a match for any 2 of the
>other armies best CAF. With the way they are now they have the CAF of
>Greater Deamons for Chaos, and this is way unbalanced example Great Unclean
>one +7CAF, Lord of change +8CAF. So in retro we have complete companies of
>these walking the battle field. You don't see the problem here I DO!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 7:49 PM
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Do we need to change anything?
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I want to know if we proceed with suggested changes or scrap the thing
> > entirely since the costs were off due to a typo.
> >
> > I think we should leave as is as people test more stuff, especially with
>the
> > right costs!
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
>
>
>____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
>Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
>___________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Received on Fri Oct 13 2000 - 12:20:58 UTC